Respect devotees of KFC; don’t put the statue of Colonel Sanders in Church

Share on email
Share on whatsapp
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on reddit

Suppose a Catholic loves Kentucky Fried Chicken and talks about it incessantly. His fellow co-religionists may find it odd, worry about his arteries, but would likely consider him harmlessly eccentric.

Suppose KFC Catholic decides to take it one step further. He carries the statue of Colonel Sanders in procession, places it on the altar, and starts to prostrate in front of the statue.
If his fellow Catholics were really patient, they might ask him to leave and to take his statue with him.

If “zeal for My house has consumed [them]” (John 2:17), they might decide to throw both statue and person out of the church and (hopefully) only Colonel Sanders into the Singapore River.

The issue in this case was never about whether KFC is objectively tasty, or whether Colonel Sanders is a good man for having invented a recipe requiring 13 herbs and spices.

The issue is the type of honor to Colonel Sanders that is due only to God.

The essence of idolatry is not simply a straightforward case of worshiping something intrinsically evil.

Idolatry is often more subtle. It is the giving of honor and priority to a creature, which is due only to the Creator.

As the Catechism states:

“Idolatry not only refers to false pagan worship. It remains a constant temptation to faith. Idolatry consists in divinizing what is not God. Man commits idolatry whenever he honors and reveres a creature in place of God, whether this be gods or demons, power, pleasure, race, ancestors, the state, money etc.” (CCC 2113)

Catholics who have been following the Pachamama debacle know where this piece is going.

An Amazonian bishop, Jose Luis Azcona, has slammed the prostration towards the statue of Pachamama and its presence on the altar of a Church as a “demonic sacrilege”.

On the other hand, we have a booklet produced by the mission wing of the Italian bishops conference which contained a prayer to Pachamama asking for blessings for a good harvest.

Bishop Azcona did not say that the Pachamama is demonic per se.

Rather, it is the veneration of the Pachamama by Catholics that is due only to the Triune God that is labeled a demonic sacrilege.

Bishop Azcona has called this correctly.

Again the issue is not whether the sentiments expressed, i.e. the desire for a good harvest etc., are positive or not. The issue is idolatry, the giving of honor due to something which is not God.

It may well be the case that Amazonian pagans are not engaged in idol worship when they prostrate to the pachamama. They do not know any better and believe that she is a goddess.

Catholics, on the other hand, who know the Triune God revealed in Jesus Christ, would be guilty of grave sin if they do the same.

Respecting the religiosity of non-Christians is not the issue at stake.

At stake is the Church’s self-understanding. Is Jesus Christ God’s definitive self-revelation?
Does His bride the Church possess a unique revelation of God or not? Or is Christianity simply one religion among many, which has to repent from the idolatry of believing that it has the fullness of truth?

If the Church still believes what Lumen Gentium teaches, that the “Church of Christ subsists in the Catholic Church” (LG 8), then Cardinal Müller would be right.

“The great mistake was to bring the idols into the Church,” replies the cardinal, “not to put them out, because according to the Law of God Himself – the First Commandment – idolism [idolatry] is a grave sin and not to mix them with the Christian liturgy.”

“To put it out,” Müller continues, “to throw it out, can be against human law, but to bring the idols into the Church was a grave sin, a crime against the Divine Law.”

Most Catholic fans of Colonel Sanders would agree. Would Catholic fans of Pachamama do too?

Nick Chui

Nick Chui

Nick Chui is happily married and teaches history and Religious Education in a Catholic secondary school in Singapore. He has a Masters in Theological studies from the John Paul II Institute for Marriage and Family, Melbourne.

Leave a Replay

2 thoughts on “Respect devotees of KFC; don’t put the statue of Colonel Sanders in Church”

  1. Avatar

    This is something of a false comparison. Harland Sanders is a (deceased) man, a soul Christ came to save; as such he was neither perfectly good (he was, after all, a 33° Scottish Rite freemason) nor entirely evil. Pachamama is either a fictional character, at best like “Lady Liberty” or Uncle Sam, or she is demon, or perhaps a bit of both. It is possible to feel gratitude or affection for Harland Sanders, but it is pointless to feel gratitude toward the Statue of Liberty per se or affection for Uncle Sam per se, and it is a mistake to feel either for a demon.

    Even if Pachamama is ONLY a work of literary fiction, like Emperor Palpatine, some attention should be paid to what exactly that literary fiction says about the character. It is good to put statues of St. George and St. Luke in churches (though they are not to be adored); it is dubious to put a statue of George Lucas in a church; it is bad to put a statue of Yoda in a church; it is worse to put a statue of Palpatine in a church.

  2. Avatar

    If Idolatry is the giving of honor and priority to a creature which is due only to the Creator; and is the divinizing of what is not God; and the honoring and revering of a creature in place of God, shouldn’t many Catholics reexamine how they relate to saints; especially, Mary? All are creatures of God.
    The word ‘divinizing’ is widely used in the Church today when referring to ourselves and others. This type of thing may be an opening for what is happening today in the Church that so many disapprove of.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up for our Newsletter

Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit

%d bloggers like this: