The New Evangelization: What’s new, why now?

Evangelization: Why is the Gospel good news?

The word “evangelization” comes from the Greek “Euangelion” meaning the announcing of good news. St Paul and the apostles were excited about the person and message of Jesus. They had encountered Jesus as a Savior, who by His cross and resurrection, has triumphed over sin and death, and who has sent His Holy Spirit to accompany His followers in all things. The command by Jesus to “go teach all nations” was not felt as a burden imposed upon them, but as a joyful obligation. They had experienced true freedom in the Gospel “for freedom Christ has set us free”, and they wanted to proclaim this to the world, that God has made adoption as His children possible in Christ.

Through the preaching of the apostles, those who became Christian in the early Church felt the same freedom. St. Justin Martyr felt that Christ was the fulfillment of his vocation as a philosopher. St. Agatha felt herself to be a spouse of Jesus. To preserve her vow of virginity, she refused marriage to a pagan noble and suffered martyrdom as a result. St. Augustine, after living a chaotic life, famously declared after his baptism, “You have made us for ourselves O Lord, and our hearts are restless until they rest in you.” The ancient world was stirred by Christ and His message. The human person has a royal dignity and a direct link with the Creator. God in Jesus Christ is the friend of the human person. And the countless Powers—gods, spirits, demons—weighing upon the soul with all their terrors, now crumbled into dust.

Why a “new” evangelization?

If evangelization is the announcing of good news, why the need for a new evangelization? John Paul II, who first coined the phrase “new evangelization”, clarified that the message of the Gospel has certainly not changed. What has changed however was the fact that

i. A growing number of Christians, in traditionally Christian countries, no longer experience Christianity, especially its moral teaching, as liberation but as a burden. They practice their religion “as if they have just returned from a funeral.”

ii. Increasingly educated and exposed to science and reason, the doctrines of Christianity were also experienced as somehow pre-scientific and having no rational basis.

Two convenient options

Faced with these two challenges, a Catholic can take the “soft” option. He can (at least in his own mind) “water down” the Church’s moral teaching, especially its difficult and inconvenient ones. Faced with accusations that he is being “pre-scientific”, he could also discard the seemingly incomprehensible “supernatural” doctrines of Christianity (the resurrection or the virgin birth, for example) and focus on what seems to be “reasonable.”

He can also take the “hard” option. In the face of a hostile world, he can retreat into his private Catholic space, with other like-minded Catholics, viewing the “hard” teachings as a necessary burden to attain heaven in the next life and diagnosing Catholics who have difficulties in believing as somehow lacking in faith. “If only they pray more and have more faith and don’t question too much.”

The teaching of the New Evangelization proposes a third option. John Paul II declares that the new Evangelization must be new “in ardor, methods and expression.” Let’s look at these in turn.

New in Ardor

Ardor refers primarily to enthusiasm and excitement. This is something that cannot be “faked”. It has to be real. It has to flow from an encounter, or a re-encounter with the person of Jesus Christ. Hence, Singapore Archbishop William Goh’s emphasis on the “conversion experience”, where one recognizes that he is a sinner in need of grace. Jesus Christ is experienced no longer as simply a great moral teacher but one’s personal savior. To continue fanning the flame of conversion, the Archbishop insists on the cultivating of an intense prayer life and on-going formation so that the converted disciple can better share the Gospel with others.

New in Method

There is a move away from teaching Catechism as simply “doctrines to be learnt” or “moral teachings to be followed.” Rather, at the heart of Catechesis is to facilitate for the child an encounter with the person of Christ. Doctrines and the Church’s moral teaching flow from that encounter. They liberate the person to live a new life in Christ. They point to Him. They are not ends in themselves. The catechist is not “the teacher” but a “facilitator.” Christ is the Teacher. The catechist is there to facilitate the encounter. He is not “God’s lawyer.” Rather, he is a co-pilgrim with his students in the journey of life. He has nevertheless found Christ in his pilgrimage of life and is thus there to share this with his students.

I remembered one incident that might illustrate this new approach. I bumped into my student who was hanging outside church and not attending Mass. In my earlier years as a Catechist, I would actually have focused straight away on his non-attendance at Mass and tell him that what he is doing is very wrong and that he should go for confession and then for Mass the next time. This time, I did something different. I said hello and asked him if he would like to chat a while as he seemed to have things on his mind. What followed was a 30 minute conversation where he shared about how he felt that Church teaching is restricting his freedom and that his family situation is unhappy. I acknowledged his feelings as very real and shared with him how, in my own experience, I too had these feelings but had gradually found Christ to be a source of freedom. I did not focus on what he “did not do.” A year later, while preparing another batch of students for confirmation, he waved at me and said that he too has decided to get confirmed. He too had experienced the love of Christ for him and found in the Catholic faith a source of true freedom. While I would never dare to take any credit for his conversion, I nevertheless shudder to think what might have happened if I had “scolded” him for not attending Mass during our first encounter, out of a sense of misguided zeal.

New in Expression.

Icon written by Br. Claude Lane, OSB, Mount Angel Abbey, Saint Benedict, OR, USA

It is easy to simply reduce the phrase “new in expression” to the need for Catholics to be “up to date”, especially in the use of social media (Facebook etc). While social media is certainly an important means of evangelization, the call for a “new expression” is deeper than that. It is a call to re-present the person and message of Christ in a manner that is comprehensible, challenging and compelling to a new generation. It would be no use for instance to say “Jesus Christ saves you from sin” when the culture has lost a sense of sin. Rather, a patient dialogue about the nature of right and wrong would be an important first step in precisely recovering such a sense, and then showing how Christ saves us from the burden of an overwhelming guilt. The art of learning how to understand the cultural situation in the light of Christ would require formation. But the acquiring of such knowledge is not simply “book knowledge” but flows from the fervor to make Christ known to others.

Conclusion: Mary, the Star of the New Evangelization

On 27th Sept 2014, Archbishop William Goh consecrated Singapore to Mary, the Star of the New Evangelisation. In this, we ask not only for our blessed Mother’s powerful intercession, but also through the studying of her life, we will know how to go about our tasks of evangelizing. As the Archbishop declared in his pastoral letter, it is from Mary that we learn i) that the New Evangelization is urgent. That it is ii) principally a witness of love. That it must iii) begin from a contemplation of the Word of God and that iv) it must possess a spirit of poverty and the recognition of the primacy of grace.


Image: Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Succour

6 thoughts on “The New Evangelization: What’s new, why now?”

  1. Avatar
    douglas kraeger

    Nick, A couple of questions: If we want to evangelize someone (cooperate with the Holy Spirit who actually does the job) How can we help them regain the Key of Knowledge IF they do not have it?
    What is the key that Jesus is talking about when he says in Luke 11:52, “Woe to you, scholars of the law! You have taken away the key of knowledge. You yourselves did not enter and you stopped those trying to enter.”
    “You have taken away the key of knowledge.” In order to take something away, it has to have already been given by God. A key is something that is absolutely needed to unlock a locked door. God says there is a key, that has been given to everyone and that the “scholars of the law have taken it away”, therefore we must find the “key” again and take it back, the key that God wants us to seek that is absolutely necessary for unlocking the door to attaining one of the Gifts of the holy Spirit, Knowledge.
    Any parent or teacher knows how “impossible” it is to teach a child that does not want to learn, and conversely, how easy it is to teach the child that wants to learn.
    What is more fundamental, more of a key to the Spirit of Knowledge, than that a person honestly wants to know, and therefore IS open to and honestly seeking to know, all the Truths that God wants everyone to want to know?
    Nick, what do you think is the Key of Knowledge that Jesus says the scholars of the law have taken away if it is not the honest, sincere desire to know all the truths that God wants everyone to want to know?
    HOW Do some ministers implicitly take this key away from people? How can we help ministers restore the key to knowledge?

  2. Avatar

    It has always been a curiosity to me, that nobody did anything in the name of JP2 until several years after he died. You didn’t hear any of this “new evangelization” business back in the 1980’s or 1990’s. This causes me to really wonder what’s driving this stuff, because it has never seemed very “Catholic” to me.

    1. Avatar
      Adrian Johnson

      I would have “gotten the point” of the new evangelisation sooner if they had just said plainly that it was re-evangelizing fallen-away Catholics. One good clue was that “Beauty” had been neglected as a tool of evangelisation whereas Truth and Goodness are often unappealing without it– the nefarious “spirit of Vatican II” stripped away a lot of beauty in the name of a “holy simplicity” which I and countless others found cold, sterile and boring. One good thing about the New Evangelisation was the renewed emphasis on really beautiful liturgical art that you actually liked looking at and which raised your heart and mind to God and prayer.

  3. Avatar

    Hi Nick,

    Great article. One small point though: We must stress that the New Evangelization is targeted against nations, not individuals or families.

    1. Avatar
      Adrian Johnson

      “Targeted against?” How negative. And nations are made up of individuals and families. Souls are saved individually, not in job-lots or wholesale 🙂

  4. Avatar
    Quo Vadis? 何処へ

    I recognize and positively evaluate many truth and ideas, but I disagree in many points of the proposed “New Evangelization”, and especially with the “New Method” proposed in the article.Let me abbraviate the quotation from the text: (Part 1)”There is a move away from teaching Catechism as simply “doctrines to be learnt” or “moral teachings to be followed.” Rather, at the heart of Catechesis is to facilitate for the child an encounter with the person of Christ. (Part 2) Doctrines and the Church’s moral teaching flow from that encounter….(Part 3) The catechist is not “the teacher” but a “facilitator.” Christ is the Teacher. ….Rather, he is a co-pilgrim with his students in the journey of life. He… [is there] to share this [encounter wit Christ] with his students”. Allow me to divide that text into parts: 1,2 & 3, and point out its downright mischievous character.
    Ad part 1 : Almost total ignorance of CC’ dogmas and morality [which are the formulation of Christ’s Gospel] and inability to explain them to themselves and – if asked – to others, is the PRIMARY CAUSE of leaving the Church and rejecting CHRISTianity. They don’t know what Christ and His Church is proposing to them !!
    Ad part 2 : How you “encounter Christ” when you don’t know WHAT HE HAS TAUGHT and WHAT HE IS DEMANDING from His followers ? [“he who loves me obeys my commandmants…].
    Ad part 3 : The teachers as “facilitators” or “co-pilgrims” is sheer slogan. Those “teachers” have nothing to CONVEY to the listeners. Look at Christ, Peter…Stephen…Paul….Francis Xavier….they had spoken with authority…expounding the truth unknown to their listeners!
    Why have I pinpointed those ones ? Because almost all catholics of the sc. WEST had jumped on this method after the disastrous VAT.II and they have the “fruits” of their protestant way of preaching, facilitating, accompanying of the listeners. All Americas & in particular the USA & Canada, Western EU.
    YET, the Poland, Hungary, Ukraine, Russia – so far – are different because they followed the preaching method of Christ…disciples and CC’ 2000 history! But they too begin to lean towards their Western “brothers” who de facto preach like “St. Luther” and his followers in heresies !
    I’m from Pol….and have spent 40 years teaching to students of all sort, politeists, pantheists, catholics…in Jpn. I’d learnt that the “Doctrines and the Church’s moral teaching DON’T flow from that encounter”…..FROM THE ENCOUNTER WITH CHRIST WHO DOES’T EXPOUND THE TRUTH AND COMMAMNDMENTS flows only relativism, neo-modernism, macroevolutionism SUBJECTIVE sinlessness and LGBTQ’s “gifts from the Holy Spirit” !

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.