The Field Hospital Church? Maybe Not.

Share on email
Share on whatsapp
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on reddit

3967872842_0789dd4866_b

Healing Wounds Begins With Radical Love

It’s a beautiful Autumn Sunday morning at St. Joseph’s Catholic Church. The homily is over, the Creed has been professed, and the reader is nearly done with the prayers of the faithful. He gets to the fourth prayer, when he reads, “For women who have had suffered through the sin of abortion: that they come to repent and believe in the Gospel of Life, and receive healing forgiveness from God, let us pray to the Lord.” At that moment, a young 21-year-old woman slips out the back of the church, determined to never return to this church or any Catholic church ever again.

That same evening across town, a young man decides that it’s time to talk to his mom and dad about something he’s terrified to tell them. After family dinner, he asks if they can come to the living room. Taking a few long breaths, he fearfully utters to them that he’s gay and is not sure he believes in God anymore, because he doesn’t understand how God could make him gay and not want him to experience love. His mother begins to cry: she suspected this was coming for some time. His Dad, utterly surprised, raises his voice at him in confusion and embarrassment, and tells him that he has a month to find somewhere else to live until he gets his life back together.

Next door to that family, a husband and father of two in his mid-forties tells his wife he’s heading to grab a drink with some buddies and jumps in his car. Instead, though, he heads to a woman’s house in the next town over. He met her three years ago on Facebook: she was an old friend from high school. They’ve been having an affair for the past two years. Later in the week the wife will find out, and the family will be ripped apart, leaving the wife, the kids, and also the husband shocked, and alone.

The three stories outlined above are real stories, and they are not infrequent. In fact, each of these will happen today, probably on many occasions; a pregnant woman will turn to the Church or subtly ask a Christian for help, only to feel rejected by a well-intentioned, but harsh-sounding response; a young man will come out and openly share his feelings and feel rejected by his family, those whom should love him most; and a quiet family will be instantly torn apart by the exposing of an affair, leaving everybody hurt, confused, and feeling utterly alone.

Frequent readers of Catholic content and those who follow news about Pope Francis are likely familiar with an article published in America Magazine by Fr. Spadaro, S.J. in September, 2013, in which Pope Francis proposed the image of the ‘field hospital’ as a model for how he envisions the Church in the 21st century:

I see clearly that the thing the church needs most today is the ability to heal wounds and to warm the hearts of the faithful; it needs nearness, proximity. I see the church as a field hospital after battle. It is useless to ask a seriously injured person if he has high cholesterol and about the level of his blood sugars! You have to heal his wounds. Then we can talk about everything else. Heal the wounds, heal the wounds…. And you have to start from the ground up.’

An Honest Assessment of Ourselves

For the past year, bishops, dioceses, parishes, and individuals have been prayerfully meditating on and discussing the Holy Father’s image of the Church as being the ‘field hospital’ of the world, meaning the Church becoming the ‘emergency room’ and ‘critical care unit’ for those who have been wounded as they go about their daily lives. For me, these discussions have brought sentiments of excitement, but also discouragement at the same time. On the one hand, how exciting and true and wonderful and beautiful that we are called to be the ‘field hospital’ for men and women who are broken! This it the key! This will bring men and women to Christ! How can it not?

On the other hand, meditation on the image of the field hospital has been, quite frankly, somewhat discouraging, especially when we take off the rose-colored glasses and take an honest look at where we are today as the Body of Christ. More specifically, it’s discouraging to meditate on the way that we Christians talk about, treat, and see those who (in keeping with the metaphor) are bloody, missing limbs, and barely alive out in the ‘field’ of the world.

Why am I discouraged?  Those who are bleeding accuse us of being judgmental. We hear that we are strict, we are mean, and closed-minded. We’re anti-love, anti-fun, and anti-thinking. We don’t like to reason with our minds, and we certainly don’t tolerate different views or opinions.

Or we may think that none of this is true. It’s not us that’s the problem – it’s them! They are the ones who are intolerant. They are prideful. They are closed-minded of our views.

And yet, if we are humble and know ourselves well, it is likely we are or have been guilty of many, if not all of these accusations at some point. And because wisdom suggests that reputation precedes reality a lot of the time, perhaps it’s good to take another look at ourselves.

Renewing Hearts, Opening Eyes

Here’s the point, quite directly: the Holy Father’s call to the Church to fulfill her missionary mandate of being the field hospital for the most wounded members of society will remain to be only a false mirage, a reality never manifested unless and until each member of the Body of Christ resolves to allow the Holy Spirit to open our eyes and to see every single man, every single woman and every single child as God Himself sees them, no matter the number, the kind, the guilt, or the scandal caused by their wounds and sins, and perhaps even because of them. Additionally, if a renewal of mind and heart on an individual level is not achieved, the image could remain a mirage, and might even become a temptation and catalyst in fueling self-righteousness and pride, in that while the members claim that the Church is a refuge of healing, the reality will remain exactly the contrary.

We can no longer be afraid to clean up blood. In other words, we must resolve by our will and by the help of God to no longer allow ourselves to be scandalized by other people’s wounds or behaviors, no matter what. Without lowering our expectations and knowledge of what man is in fact capable of knowing and becoming, we, at the same time, cannot allow scandal, disgust, or lack of knowledge to impede us in our work of seeing and treating anybody as anything other than the sole object of God’s love. The task at hand, no matter the procedure, must not dissuade us from caring for and healing the injured.

The field-hospital image will only become a reality if we, as individuals, begin seeing people as God sees them. After such a renewal of mind and heart, and only after such a renewal, will the realization of the Church’s mission begin to occur.

Developing Bedside Manner

I recently heard the following statement, or something like it: the parable of the lost sheep is no longer relevant for us today. Why? Because today, it’s not that only that one of the 100 sheep has wandered off and is in danger; no, rather, it’s the 99 that have wandered away, and seemingly only one sheep remains.

And yet, everything we do is to serve the one sheep that remains. We serve that one sheep only. We love that sheep only. And we use language that only the one sheep understands.

Recall at the beginning of the article the young woman who slipped out the back of the church during the prayers of the faithful. It was because the language chosen that day to pray for women hurt by abortion were words that, to somebody who doesn’t speak or think like a Catholic, were not only foreign to her, they also conveyed the idea that she had no worth. Although that was not at all what was meant, what she heard was that her abortion, which she thought she really needed at the time and hadn’t really thought about or was not guilty about, was so bad to these people in this church that she would never be welcome in this church.

To us, to the one sheep, we know better. To her, one of the 99, that’s what she heard. And she didn’t stick around long enough to learn otherwise.

Whose fault? Ours.

Transfusion: A Change of Heart

But changing our language to simply be more loving is not enough. It’s not enough to put a bandaid on somebody who missing their leg. The words we speak are often a reaction to what is going on in the heart. In order for us to authentically love, we must first renew our hearts, so that the words that come from our mouths are in tune with hearts that love, no matter what.

I don’t know what the implications are for us, for our parishes, for our dioceses. The point is to pay attention. Where are we at?

Do we really love people, or do we react to their wounds inappropriately?

When we meet somebody who is bloody, is our first desire to learn about and attend to their wounds?

Do we fear the ‘blood’ of people’s lives and run from it?

Are my actions, behaviors, and words the reason somebody will never come to know Jesus Christ?

 

 

Ryan Eggenberger

Ryan Eggenberger

Ryan Eggenberger is a partner at Little Flower Strategies, LLC. He writes about travel, marketing, and his terrible parking skills. Follow him on twitter at @RyanEggenberger.

Leave a Replay

5 thoughts on “The Field Hospital Church? Maybe Not.”

  1. Avatar

    Loving someone is willing the good for them, willing them to be good, to be holy and for us to do what we can to help them choose to be as holy as possible as quickly as possible. It means learning where they are emotionally and theologically. It means focusing on the points we both know and can agree on, starting at the most basic basics. Perhaps asking questions like: Do you “know” in your “heart of hearts”, is it a fact that you can know and believe as a starting point, that true peace in the family, community, nation, world, in each person’s soul, is an objectively good goal and each of us should strive for this goal, for this peace? Is it absolutely, objectively, morally right and good for people to want to help others and should people be upset or insulted if someone offers them unsolicited help? How can there be an absolute objective moral order without creator God establishing it as an absolute and also revealing it to us?

    You said in the article, “Where are we at?” I think we have to be honest and admit that there are very few people in the pews who are healthy enough to help others and therefore the medicine should be such as to help make us healthier as well as help others. Perhaps looking at 2 Thes. 2:10, “He will give them a deceiving spirit because they have not accepted the love of truth so that they may be saved” and ask what does it mean to truly accept true love of truth? Should we seek it with our whole heart? Should we want others accept the love of it and seek it?

    1. Avatar

      Great thoughts. Yeah I agree with you – not everybody who is bloody is going to want help. The point drawn here, though, is simply that people are often so bloody, they’re actually scared away maybe when we try to offer help. It’s as if we need to change our language (NOT lower the bar, expectations, or change doctrine by any means) so as to be able to approach and to help clean the wound. I’m just asking that we take a look and ponder if whatever we’ve been doing in the past is not working, as the 99 have gone astray. I could be wrong, and I’m open to that.

  2. Avatar

    I am reminded of the Women’s Bible Study group in a previous parish. We didn’t study the Bible very much but we did read a number of encyclicals, pray and eat together, and become friends. On one occasion, one woman indicated she had had two abortions and felt nothing. I asked, “But ought you not feel something?” She had never considered that possibility. We all began to pray for her and be her friend (as she was our friend) while the leader of the group, swept her up in love and within several months, the post-abortive woman attended a retreat for women who’ve had abortions.

    Being a field hospital requires befriending first and hanging in there until we trust/are trusted enough to share our stories. It’s entering into each others’ lives. It’s a radical change in attitude towards how to proclaim the Gospel. What the Gospel is remains the same. Trusting that the Holy Spirit is providing “the how” is the difficult part. We must be willing to become patient instruments of grace. When we do, God works miracles.

    Drusilla Barron (http://lovedasif.com)

  3. Pingback: Book: Cardinals Defend Doctrine on Divorce - BigPulpit.com

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up for our Newsletter

Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit

%d bloggers like this: