God is Not the Author of Your Heartbreak

Broken Heart

The above quote from Venerable Fulton Sheen caused some consternation on the Ignatius Press Quotables Facebook page, and among some of my friends when I shared it.  Frankly, I think it’s beautiful, so I thought I would try to explain it.

Like most one-liners, this quote can be easily misunderstood if taken out of context.  In context, Sheen is discussing the anointing of Our Lord’s feet by Mary Magdalene.  He is concentrating on the fact that she broke the bottle.

 She could have poured the spikenard out slowly, drop by drop; but she did not.  Instead, she gave everything.  Sheen writes:

Mary Magdalene . . . did not do what you and I would do. She did not pour out the precious perfume drop by drop as if to indicate by the slowness of the giving the generosity of the gift. She broke the vessel and gave everything, for love knows no limits. Immediately the house was filled with perfume. It was almost as if, after the death of that perfume and the breaking of the bottle, there was a resurrection. Broken things are precious. We eat broken bread because we share in the death of our Lord and his broken life. Broken flowers give perfume. Broken incense is used in adoration. A broken ship saved Paul and many other passengers on the way to Rome. Sometimes the only way the good Lord can get into some hearts is to break them. (Through the Year with Fulton J. Sheen)

Sheen’s analogies are borne out in our daily lives.  We have to break bread before we can eat it; we have to crush grapes before we can drink wine, as he writes in Life of Christ; incense is crushed in order that it may rise to Heaven in the Holy Sacrifice.

The first thing to understand when looking at this quote is that God is not the Author of evil.  God is Goodness itself; He is Love itself; He is Mercy itself.  He cannot cause or bring about evil, pain, or suffering.  What He does is permit evil, because He knows a greater good will come of it.  That is His prerogative alone, to bring good out of evil, to permit evil in order that a greater good may come of it.  This quote is not promoting the idea that the end justifies the means.  If this quote meant that the ends justifies the means, then it would mean that God directly causes the heartbreak in order to bring someone closer to Himself.  As Goodness itself, though, He cannot directly cause heartbreak.

Why does He permit it?  He permits the heartbreak that through it we might come closer to His Broken Heart, that Heart which was pierced with a lance for you, for me, for each of us.  Don’t think that just because He was God, He doesn’t know what our broken hearts feel like; His Heart was broken, too: by the lance, yes, but also throughout His life.  He knows our suffering; He experienced it.  Don’t think that just because He was God, He got an easy ticket through life. His earthly life in the 1st century was as much a “vale of tears” as our earthly lives are for us in the 21st century.
Are we suffering family problems, the betrayal of a dear friend?  He suffered when Judas betrayed Him; He wept over Jerusalem, which had turned its back on Him and was soon to put Him to death.
Are we grieving the loss of a loved one?  He grieved when Lazarus died;  He wept and they marveled because they saw how much He loved him (Jn. 11:35).
 Are we bitter or angry with God for not answering our prayers?  He asked His Father to let the chalice pass (Mt. 26:39) and yet, because it was the Father’s Will that He drink it to the dregs, He accepted it: “Nevertheless, not as I will, but as Thou wilt.”

Do we feel like God has abandoned us and doesn’t care about our problems?  He cried out on the Cross–not in despair, but in a moment of sympathy with all atheists throughout the centuries (Sheen, Life of Christ, 379)–“My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?” (Mt. 27:46). 

* * *
“Sometimes the only way the Good Lord can get into some hearts is to break them.”

I’ve heard some say that this quote is sick and twisted, that pain and suffering can draw you away from God. And it is true that if we look at this quote in the wrong way–by viewing God as the direct Cause and Author of our heartbreak–then it is sick.  If God, Who is all-good, all-loving, and all-merciful, were to directly cause pain and suffering and heartbreak just to teach us a lesson–then that would be sick.  But He doesn’t do that.  He’s not like that.  Because of Who He is–Goodness itself–He cannot cause evil.

Because I believe that God cannot cause directly the heartbreak of which Sheen speaks, I am able to see a certain beauty and truth in this quote.  By the grace of God, I believe that God is all-merciful, all-loving, all-good.  I believe that, because He is Goodness itself, He cannot cause evil.

And, yes, pain and suffering can take us away from God; they can make us bitter, they can make our faith seem like an illusion and they can make us feel that the idea of God as a loving, provident Father is a lie.  But if we let that happen, if we let the pain make us bitter; we’re doing what Pharaoh did.  When the plagues hit, he “hardened his own heart,” as Ex. 8:15 reads; he willed to resist the grace of God.  God was offering him grace and he resisted it.  The commentary on the Douay-Rheims Bible for Ex. 7:3 explains: “I shall harden: not by being the efficient cause of his hardness of heart, but by permitting it; and by withdrawing grace from him, in punishment of his malice; which alone was the proper cause of his being hardened.”  Again, God did not cause Pharaoh’s hardness of heart, but only permitted it; and because Pharaoh persisted in sin, He withdrew His grace from him, because mortal sin and God’s grace cannot exist simultaneously.

If we have a wound, the only way we’re going to keep that wound from becoming infected is to cleanse it with rubbing alcohol or hydrogen peroxide–and that stuff stings.  If our hearts are hardened, bitter or closed against God, sometimes the only thing that will bring us back to Him, that will open our hearts to His mercy, His love, and His grace, is if He allows suffering to “break” our hearts, to help us realize that this world is not all there is and that in eternity His Love and Mercy and Goodness will make our sufferings in this life seem like nothing.

He loves us.  He sees our pain.  He wants us to come to Him: “Come to Me, all you that labour, and are burdened, and I will refresh you” (Mt. 11:28).
God Love Y’All!
Emily C. Hurt

Emily C. Hurt

Emily C. Hurt is a 2012 graduate of Christendom College with a Bachelor's in Theology. She wrote her Senior Thesis on "Redemptive Suffering in the Theology of the Servant of God Fulton J. Sheen." When she's not job-hunting or reading Fulton Sheen, she writes about the writings of Fulton Sheen, redemptive suffering, and her alma mater at her blog, www.theological-librarian.blogspot.com.

Leave a Replay

4 thoughts on “God is Not the Author of Your Heartbreak”

  1. Pingback: Second John Paul II Miracle Approved - BigPulpit.com

  2. Pingback: God is Not the Author of Your Heartbreak - CATHOLIC FEAST - Every day is a Celebration

  3. Emily,
    Can’t believe your last name is Hurt! Did you ever reflect on that irony, and the way you have been led to explore Redemptive Suffering. Every once in a while the Lord brings me back to this very central theme of our Catholic Faith. Wondering if you have ever thought of starting a Blog for fellow sufferers of all kinds, physical, mental, relational, etc., where they could plug in to make sense of their suffering, find encouragement to bear it, find resources to do the previous two points, give testimony of the fruit of their suffering, sharing stories of saints who have been through it and been sanctified by embracing it, give hope to the discouraged, hopeless, even those stuggling with despair. Just a thought. Thanks for your great sharing. Keep up the good work, trust in the Lord, he’s preparing you for your life’s work, mission, career. In the Peace and Joy of Christ, Randy M

    1. Randy,
      I have a blog: http://www.Theological-Librarian.blogspot.com, where to some degree I write about redemptive suffering, Fulton Sheen, and other topics. I had not thought about the coincidence between my last name and my interest in redemptive suffering. One of these days, though, I will write a blog post about the experience (not directly in my own life) that led me to explore the problem of suffering, my reactions to those experiences, and then the suffering that hit me in the face after I had wrestled intellectually with the problem. God Love you!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up for our Newsletter

Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit